« DocAllergies »
the most recent document references on  :: allergies
Google
 
 Web   www.DocAllergies.info 
advertising   for info on promotion and advertising click here
references in other languages:   malattie allergiche malattie allergiche    allergies allergies    alergias alergias    allergies allergies    Allergien Allergien     
 
 
allergies
asthma
atopy
conjunctivitis
dermatitis
eczema
food allergies
latex allergies
rhinitis
therapies
Root folder




    Related themes:
     :: DocRenewableEnergy::
     :: DocQuality::
     :: DocPrivacy::
     :: DocBiotechnology::
     :: DocCancers::
     :: DocHeartDiseases::
     :: DocAllergies::
     :: DocAlternativeMedicine::
     :: DocNutrition::
     :: DocPsychology::
 

Abstract. . .  substitution of SFA in the diet by an equal amount of cis -UFA (both MUFA and PUFA) reduces LDL-cholesterol. Thus UFA consumption may play an important Page 4 http://www.efsa.eu.int/science/nda/nda_opinions/catindex_en.html Page 4 of 4 nutritional role in limiting SFA intake. Claim: High unsaturated fat - the amount of unsaturated fat is 70% of the total fat content The claim as outlined may be made . . .
. . .  beans and lentils, berries, cereals and white fish. This anomaly arises because the UFA threshold is expressed as % of total fat content which is not directly related to the level of fat in the food or to typical intake of the food.  . . .
. . .  a food contains high amount of unsaturated fat and any claim likely to have the same meaning for the consumer may only be made where the amount of unsaturated fat is 70% of the total fat content in the product. The Scientific Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies has considered the proposed claims and concludes as follows. Page 2 http://www.efsa.eu.int/science/nda/nda_opinions/catindex_en.html . . .
. . .  contains high amount of unsaturated fat and any claim likely to have the same meaning for the consumer may only be made where the amount of unsaturated fat is 70% of the total fat content in the product. The Scientific Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies has considered the proposed claims and concludes as follows. Page 2 http://www.efsa.eu.int/science/nda/nda_opinions/catindex_en.html  . . .
. . .  high amount of unsaturated fat and any claim likely to have the same meaning for the consumer may only be made where the amount of unsaturated fat is 70% of the total fat content in the product. The Scientific Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies has considered the proposed claims and concludes as follows. Page 2 http://www.efsa.eu.int/science/nda/nda_opinions/catindex_en.html Page . . .
--2340,5,234,2506,11699

...downloading document:

Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition ...

from:   www.efsa.europa.eu

If download not starts automatically click here





  Other documents about the same arguments:
Click here to see more documents


      [1]Food Allergies
      PDF [64,1 KB]  From [www.health.com]  Last viewed: 22.09.2006 22.09.2006

      [2]Allergies:
      PDF [3550,3 KB]  From [www.tdi.state.tx.us]  Last viewed: 22.09.2006 22.09.2006

      [3]Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition ...
      PDF [204,2 KB]  From [www.efsa.europa.eu]  Last viewed: 22.09.2006 21.09.2006

      [4]Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition ...
      PDF [101,2 KB]  From [www.efsa.europa.eu]  Last viewed: 22.09.2006 21.09.2006

      [5]Statement of the Scientific Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition ...
      PDF [96,2 KB]  From [www.efsa.europa.eu]  Last viewed: 22.09.2006 21.09.2006

      [6]Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition ...
      PDF [108,0 KB]  From [www.efsa.europa.eu]  Last viewed: 22.09.2006 21.09.2006

      [7]Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition ...
      PDF [122,6 KB]  From [www.efsa.europa.eu]  Last viewed: 22.09.2006 21.09.2006

      [8]Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition ...
      PDF [159,0 KB]  From [www.efsa.europa.eu]  Last viewed: 22.09.2006 21.09.2006

      [9]Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition ...
      PDF [204,7 KB]  From [www.efsa.europa.eu]  Last viewed: 22.09.2006 21.09.2006

      [10]Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition ...
      PDF [194,4 KB]  From [www.efsa.europa.eu]  Last viewed: 22.09.2006 21.09.2006

      [11]Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition ...
      PDF [137,4 KB]  From [www.efsa.europa.eu]  Last viewed: 22.09.2006 21.09.2006

      [12]Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition ...
      PDF [157,5 KB]  From [www.efsa.europa.eu]  Last viewed: 22.09.2006 21.09.2006

      [13]Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition ...
      PDF [68,3 KB]  From [www.efsa.europa.eu]  Last viewed: 22.09.2006 21.09.2006

      [14]Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition ...
      PDF [81,8 KB]  From [www.efsa.europa.eu]  Last viewed: 22.09.2006 21.09.2006

      [15]Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition ...
      PDF [83,0 KB]  From [www.efsa.europa.eu]  Last viewed: 22.09.2006 21.09.2006

      [16]Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition ...
      PDF [196,2 KB]  From [www.efsa.europa.eu]  Last viewed: 22.09.2006 21.09.2006

      [17]Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition ...
      PDF [126,2 KB]  From [www.efsa.europa.eu]  Last viewed: 22.09.2006 21.09.2006

      [18]Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition ...
      PDF [97,7 KB]  From [www.efsa.europa.eu]  Last viewed: 22.09.2006 21.09.2006

      [19]Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition ...
      PDF [98,3 KB]  From [www.efsa.europa.eu]  Last viewed: 22.09.2006 21.09.2006

      [20]Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition ...
      PDF [220,4 KB]  From [www.efsa.europa.eu]  Last viewed: 22.09.2006 21.09.2006

      [21]Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition ...
      PDF [175,1 KB]  From [www.efsa.europa.eu]  Last viewed: 22.09.2006 21.09.2006

      [22]Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition ...
      PDF [186,7 KB]  From [www.efsa.europa.eu]  Last viewed: 22.09.2006 21.09.2006

      [23]Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition ...
      PDF [107,1 KB]  From [www.efsa.europa.eu]  Last viewed: 22.09.2006 21.09.2006

      [24]Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition ...
      PDF [174,5 KB]  From [www.efsa.europa.eu]  Last viewed: 22.09.2006 21.09.2006

      [25]Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition ...
      PDF [204,9 KB]  From [www.efsa.europa.eu]  Last viewed: 22.09.2006 21.09.2006

      [26]Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition ...
      PDF [61,1 KB]  From [www.efsa.europa.eu]  Last viewed: 22.09.2006 21.09.2006

      [27]Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition ...
      PDF [74,4 KB]  From [www.efsa.europa.eu]  Last viewed: 22.09.2006 21.09.2006

      [28]Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition ...
      PDF [83,8 KB]  From [www.efsa.europa.eu]  Last viewed: 22.09.2006 21.09.2006

      [29]Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition ...
      PDF [74,9 KB]  From [www.efsa.europa.eu]  Last viewed: 22.09.2006 21.09.2006

      [30]Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition ...
      PDF [80,3 KB]  From [www.efsa.europa.eu]  Last viewed: 22.09.2006 21.09.2006


More recent                              Less recent

Click here to see more documents about the same arguments